This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
kvm
1/1
903-ARBP366.13
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ARBITRATION PETITION NO. 366 OF 2013
B.P.Comtrade Pvt. Ltd.
….. Petitioner
VERSUS
Gautam Mukherjee
….. Respondent
Mr.Tushar Bhavsar, a/w.Mr.Jayant Gaikwad, i/b. Mr.Ajay Khandar & Co. for the Petitioner.
Mr.Hemant Prabhulkar, i/b. Juris Consultus for the Respondent.
CORAM : R.D. DHANUKA, J. DATED : 1st APRIL, 2015
P.C .
The respondent has raised an objection about the maintainability of this petition filed under section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 on the ground that this court has no territorial jurisdiction to entertain this petition. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner on instruction seeks liberty to withdraw this petition and to file petition before the appropriate court. Petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for. No order as to costs.
[R.D. DHANUKA, J.]
B.P.Comtrade Pvt. Ltd.
Gautam Mukherjee
R.D. Dhanuka
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
