COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY
Arbitration petition disposed of in terms of consent terms tendered by the parties.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
kvm
1/1
4-ARBP1695.14
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ARBITRATION PETITION NO. 1695 OF 2014
Sandhya Bakulesh Bhagde VERSUS Kotak Mahindra Prime Ltd.
….. Petitioner
….. Respondent
Mr.Vasim Siddiqui, i/b. Mr.Kunal Bhanage for the Petitioner.
Ms.Jyoti Indalkar, i/b. Mr.Jitendra Shukla for the Respondent.
CORAM : R.D. DHANUKA, J. DATED : 1st APRIL, 2015
P.C .
Learned counsel appearing for the parties have tendered consent terms dated 31st March, 2015 duly signed by the parties and their respective advocates. Learned counsel appearing for the respondent states that Mr.Mandar D.Jadhav is an authorised representative of the respondent and produces certified copy of the Board Resolution dated 10th April, 2014 for perusal of the court. Signatures of the parties on the consent terms are identified by the respective advocates. Consent terms are taken on record and is marked 'X' for identification. Undertakings recorded in the consent terms are accepted. Arbitration petition is disposed of in terms of the consent terms.
Sandhya Bakulesh Bhagde
Kotak Mahindra Prime Ltd.
R.D. DHANUKA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
