High Court dismissed a notice of motion and subsequent review petition lodged in an arbitration matter for want of prosecution due to absence of the applicant's counsel without instructions.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
nms2672-09
vai
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.2672 OF 2009 IN REVIEW PETITION (LODGING) NO.61 OF 2008 IN ARBITRATION PETITION NO.42 OF 2008
WITH
REVIEW PETITION (LODGING) NO.61 OF 2008 IN ARBITRATION PETITION NO.42 OF 2008
Prasar Bharati through the Executive Engineer ...Applicant
IN THE MATTER BEWEEN :
Prasar Bharati through the Executive Engineer ...Petitioner V/s. M/s.Choudhury & Choudhury (India) Ltd. ...Respondent
Ms.S.I. Shah i/b S.I. Shah & Co. for the Applicant / Petitioner.
CORAM : R.D. DHANUKA, J. DATE : 30TH MARCH, 2015.
P.C. :-
on several occasions.
1/2
nms2672-09
prosecution..
(R.D. DHANUKA, J.)
2/2
Prasar Bharati through the Executive Engineer
Prasar Bharati through the Executive Engineer
M/s. Choudhury & Choudhury (India) Ltd.
R.D. Dhánuka
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
