The applicant sought to withdraw the criminal application. The court disposed of the application as withdrawn on instructions from counsel.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO.
IN THE HIGH COURT AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 947 OF 2015 (Jitendra s/o. Kaduba Gore Vs. The State of Maharashtra & Anr.)
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s Court’s or Judge’s orders orders or directions and Registrar’s orders Mr. S.S. Thombre, Advocate for applicant. Mr. S.B. Pulkundwar, APP for State. CORAM : T.V. NALAWADE & SMT. I.K. JAIN, JJ. DATED : 17th March, 2015. PER COURT : 1. The learned counsel for applicant on instruction submits that he wants to withdraw the application. Disposed of as withdrawn. [ SMT. I.K. JAIN, J. ] [ T.V. NALAWADE, J. ] ssc/
Jitendra s/o. Kaduba Gore
The State of Maharashtra
Anr.
T.V. NALAWADE
I.K. JAIN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
