High Court allowed condonation of delay and admitted three criminal appeals filed by the State for enhancement of sentence and stay of execution of acquittal, directing compliance of Cr.P.C. section 390.
Delay condoned; appeals admitted and leave to file appeal against acquittal granted; compliance of Cr.P.C. 390 directed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Cri. Appln. No. 393/15
1
IN THE HIGH COURT AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA V/S FARUKH KHAN IBRAHIM KHAN
Mr. V.D. Godbharle, APP for State.
Mr. A.S. Barlota, Advocate for respondent/accused.
CORAM : T.V. NALAWADE & SMT. I.K. JAIN, JJ. DATED : 17th March, 2015.
ORDER :
Cri. Appln. No. 393/15
2
the reasoning given in the judgment and particularly the version of prosecutrix and position of respondent in relation to Children Home. The appeal is admitted. Comply the provision of section 390 of Cr.P.C.
[ SMT. I.K. JAIN, J. ] [ T.V. NALAWADE, J. ]
ssc/
2 issues framed by the court
Whether leave to file appeals for enhancement of sentence and against acquittal be granted with condonation of delay.
Whether arguable case exists in the appeals filed under the Prevention of Atrocities Act and IPC.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
The State of Maharashtra
Farukh Khan Ibrahim Khan
T.V. Nalawade
I.K. Jain
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
