The State of Maharashtra v. Faruk Khan Ibrahim Khan
Case brief
What is this about?
Hearing appeals and applications for condonation of delay, admission of criminal appeal for sentence enhancement, and grant of leave to appeal against acquittal under IPC and SC/ST Act.
What did the court decide?
Criminal Appeal and Applications were allowed and the appeals were admitted complying with section 390 of Cr.P.C.
What the court decided
Cri. Appln. No. 393/15
1
IN THE HIGH COURT AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD
- CRI.APPLN/393/2015 In CRI.APEAL ST/73/2015 WITH CRI.APEAL/737/2014 WITH CRI.APPLN/370/2015
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA V/S FARUKH KHAN IBRAHIM KHAN
Mr. V.D. Godbharle, APP for State.
Mr. A.S. Barlota, Advocate for respondent/accused.
CORAM : T.V. NALAWADE & SMT. I.K. JAIN, JJ. DATED : 17th March, 2015.
ORDER :
- Criminal Application No. 393/2015 is filed for condonation of delay of 20 days caused in filing appeal against judgment and order of Sessions Case No. 37/2007. The State wants to file appeal for enhancement of sentence. Notice is served on other side. In view of the contents of the application, the application is allowed. Delay is condoned.
- Criminal Appeal St. No. 73/2015 is filed for enhancement of the sentence. The respondent/accused is convicted and sentenced for the offences punishable under sections 293 and 354 of I.P.C. and maximum sentence of imprisonment of one year is given. This Court has gone through
Issues for consideration
3 issues framed by the court
Whether to condone condonation of delay in filing criminal appeal.
Whether leave to file appeal against judgment and order of acquittal should be granted.
Whether to admit criminal appeal for enhancement of sentence.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
- respondent
FARUKH KHAN IBRAIM KHAN
Coram
T.V. NALAWADE
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court