Criminal application dismissed as withdrawn by the Court without adjudication on merits. No substantive legal propositions were dealt with.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
31 sr. no..odt
{1}
zIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 169 OF 2015
SHRI. SAVIO CORNELIUS DSOUZA VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
Advocate for Applicant : Mr. Shaikh Mujtaba Gulam Mustafa & Mr M. J. Bandgar APP for Respondent/State : Mr. S.D. Kaldate
CORAM : S.S. SHINDE & A.M. BADAR, JJ. DATE : 19TH JANUARY, 2015.
PER COURT:
1] Counsel for the applicant seeks liberty to withdraw the application. Application is dismissed as withdrawn. However, we make it clear that we have not entered into merits of the matter.
[A.M. BADAR] [S.S. SHINDE] JUDGE JUDGE.
grt/-
Shri. Savio Cornelius Dsouza
The State of Maharashtra
S.S. SHINDE
A.M. BADAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
