Chhotu @ Arvind Vitthalbhai Choudhary @ Patel v. the State of Maharashtra
Case brief
What is this about?
Criminal applicants from jail sought expedited hearing of pending 2013 appeals citing 9 years of imprisonment.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
pdp
appa-194 & 195-2015
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE SIDE
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 194 OF 2015
IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 20 OF 2013 WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 195 OF 2015 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 243 OF 2013
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s orders.
Court’s or Judge’s orders
Mr. H. J. Dedhia, APP for State in both the appeals.
CORAM : P. V. HARDAS AND
DR. SHALINI PHANSALKAR-JOSHI, JJ.
DATE : FEBRUARY 25, 2015.
P.C.:
These applications have been sent by the applicants from jail praying for expediting the hearing of the appeals, which are of the year 2013, on the ground that the applicants have already undergone 9 years and one month of imprisonment.
In the light of the said fact, therefore, though the appeals are of the year 2013, we allow these applications and expedite the hearing of the appeals.
(DR.SHALINI PHANSALKAR-JOSHI, J.) (P.V. HARDAS, J.)
1 of 1
State
P. V. Hardas
Dr. Shalini Phansalkar-Joshi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court