The applicant, in jail, sought directions for expeditious hearing of a bail application. The High Court noted that the Special Judge had completed hearing and closed the application for orders, rendering further intervention unnecessary. The current application was dismissed.
Application dismissed as no order necessary at this stage.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
10 Appln 64 of 2015.doc
vks
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.64 OF 2015
Vinod Babu Rampal
… Applicant.
V/s.
The State of Maharashtra …. Respondent
Applicant through jail
Mr. H. J. Dedhia, A.P.P., for the Respondent-State.
CORAM : P.V.HARDAS &
DR. SHALINI PHANSALKAR-JOSHI, J.J. DATE : 24TH FEBRUARY, 2015.
P.C. :
Page No.1 of 2
10 Appln 64 of 2015.doc
application on 17.01.2015 and the application is closed for orders. In the light of said fact, therefore, according to us, it is not necessary to pass any order on this application. We accordingly dismiss this application.
[DR. SHALINI PHANSALKAR-JOSHI, J.]
[P.V.HARDAS, J.]
Page No.2 of 2
1 issue framed by the court
Whether directions for expeditious hearing of a bail application are necessary when the lower court has already completed hearing and closed the matter for orders.
Vinod Babu Rampal
The State of Maharashtra
P.V.Hardas
Dr.Shalini Phansalkar-Joshi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
