The High Court of Judicature at Bombay heard an application by the State for condonation of a 35-day delay in filing an appeal under Section 12 of the MCOC Act. The court allowed the application and condoned the delay.
Application allowed; delay of 35 days in filing appeal condoned.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
pdp
appa-1628-14
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE SIDE
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 1628 OF 2014
IN
CRIMINAL APPEAL STAMP NO. 981 OF 2014
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s orders.
Court’s or Judge’s orders
Mrs. Sangeeta D. Shinde, APP for applicant-State.
CORAM : P. V. HARDAS AND DR. SHALINI PHANSALKAR-JOSHI, JJ.
DATE : MARCH 16, 2015.
P.C.:
This is an application by which the applicant -State seeks condonation of delay of 35 days in filing an appeal under Section 12 of the MCOC Act. It appears that respondent nos.1 and 3 have been served, while respondent no.2 has refused to accept service. None appears on behalf of the respondents when this application is called out for hearing.
For the reasons stated in the application, application is allowed and delay is condoned.
(DR.SHALINI PHANSALKAR-JOSHI, J.) (P.V. HARDAS, J.)
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the application for condonation of delay in filing the appeal should be allowed.
State
Respondent no.1
Respondent no.2
Respondent no.3
P. V. HARDAS
DR. SHALINI PHANSALKAR-JOSHI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
