evidence of PW-1 Changa is more than sufficient to prove that due to Accused No.2 Ramesh teasing the ladies in the village, wife of Janardhan Bapu Gharat has approached Narayan, the brother of deceased. An attempt was made to hold Panchayat, but Accused did not allow to hold the same. Hence, the relations between them were strained. This fact is proved through the certified extracts of the N.C. Complaints (Exhibits “48” and “49”), which are admitted in evidence under Section 294 of the Cr.P.C. One of the N.C. Complaints (Exhibit-48) goes to prove that it was lodged by PW-3 Bayobai against the four Accused, namely, Accused No.3 Dhanaji, Accused No.1 Goma, Accused No.4 Narayan and Accused No.2 Ramesh on 13th June, 1990 in respect of the incident dated 12th June, 1990, whereas, the other Complaint (Exhibit-49) was lodged by deceased Joma himself on 20th September, 1990 against Accused No.4 Narayan. The evidence of these three eye witnesses goes to prove that on the date of incident, these Accused came in front of their house at about 9 pm and teased the female members in the family. Therefore, the argument advanced that there was no immediate cause or the motive for the Accused to assault the deceased cannot be accepted. Moreover, when the evidence of eye witnesses is believed upon that deceased was dragged in front of their eyes and his dead body was brought back, then even the absence of motive becomes irrelevant.
