An application seeking directions to expedite a Sessions trial pending for five years was allowed. The High Court directed the trial court to complete the hearing as expeditiously as possible.
The application to expedite the pending hearing of Sessions Case No.231 of 2010 was allowed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
9 APPLN 49 OF 2015.doc
vks
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.49 OF 2015
Sanjay Khadkbahadur Dube
… Applicant.
V/s.
The State of Maharashtra
…. Respondent
Smt. Sonia Miskin, appointed advocate for Applicant. Smt. V.R. Bhosale, A.P.P., for the Respondent-State.
CORAM : P.V.HARDAS &
DR. SHALINI PHANSALKAR-JOSHI, JJ.
DATE : 13TH MARCH, 2015.
P.C. :
Page No.1 of 2
9 APPLN 49 OF 2015.doc
the trial is pending for the last five years. We, accordingly, expedite the hearing of the trial and direct the trial Court to complete the hearing of the Sessions trial as expeditiously as possible.
[DR. SHALINI PHANSALKAR-JOSHI, J.]
[P.V.HARDAS, J.]
Page No.2 of 2
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to direct the trial court to expedite the pending Sessions trial?
Sanjay Khadkbahadur Dube
The State of Maharashtra
P.V. Hardas
Dr. Shalini Phansalkar-Joshi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
