The High Court held that the pending appeal was infructuous and disposed thereof; consequently, the associated Notice of Motion was also disposed of.
The appeal is disposed of as infructuous; the Notice of Motion is disposed of accordingly.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPL. 56-14
VPH
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
APPEAL (L) No. 56 OF 2014 IN
NOTICE OF MOTION No. 1352 OF 2013
IN
SUIT No. 730 OF 2013
WITH
NOTICE OF MOTION (L) No. 280 OF 2014
Ashok Dattatraya Kulkarni & Ors. ... Appellants /Applicants Vs.
The State of Maharashtra & Ors. ... Respondents ***
Ms. Swapna Roopvate i/b Tushar Goradia, for the Appellants / Applicants..
Mr. Aditya Shiralkar i/b Kunal Bhanage, for Respondent Nos. 4 to 60.
CORAM : V. M. KANADE, & Smt. REVATI MOHITE DERE, JJ.
DATE : NOVEMBER 16, 2015 PC.
Sd/Sd/[Smt. REVATI MOHITE DERE, J.] [V. M. KANADE, J.]
Vinayak Halemath
1 / 1
Ashok Dattatraya Kulkarni & Ors.
The State of Maharashtra & Ors.
V. M. Kanade
Revati Mohite Dere
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
