This Court allowed a Civil Application seeking condonation of a 38-day delay by making the rule absolute on sufficient cause being made out.
Rule made absolute in terms of prayer clause (b).
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
30-CAF-892.2015
suresh
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO.892 OF 2015 IN FIRST APPEAL [STAMP] NO.36225 OF 2013
The State of Maharashtra & Anr. .... Applicants Vs. Raghunath Savalaram Thakur & Ors. .... Respondents
Mr. A.R. Patil, AGP, for the Applicants. Mr. Sachin Suryakant Punde for Respondent Nos.1 to 5.
CORAM: A.S. OKA & REVATI MOHITE DERE, JJ. DATED: JULY 27, 2015
P.C:
Heard the learned AGP for the applicants. Notice is
served to the respondents. In view of the averments made in the application, sufficient cause is made out to condone the delay of 38 days. Accordingly, rule is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (b).
(REVATI MOHITE DERE, J.) (A.S. OKA, J.)
Page 1 of 1
2 issues framed by the court
Whether delay in filing Civil Application No. 892 of 2015 warrants condonation.
Whether sufficient cause is made out to condone the delay of 38 days.
The State of Maharashtra & Anr.
Raghunath Savalaram Thakur & Ors.
A.S. OKA
REVATI MOHITE DERE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
