The High Court of Bombay dismissed the appeal for want of prosecution as neither the appellant nor his counsel appeared. The judge noted the appellant is likely not keen in pursuing the matter.
None
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPL. 133-14
VPH
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
APPEAL (L) No. 133 OF 2014 IN
ARBITRATION PETITION No. 909 OF 2013
Pankaj Kumar Singh ... Appellant Vs. Tata Motors Finance Ltd. ... Respondents
None for the Appellant. None for the Respondents.
CORAM : V. M. KANADE, & Smt. REVATI MOHITE DERE, JJ. DATE : NOVEMBER 16, 2015 PC.
. None appears on behalf of the Appellant. Even in the morning session, when the matter was called out neither Appellant nor his counsel were present. It appears that Appellant is not keen in pursuing the appeal. Hence, appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Sd/Sd/[Smt. REVATI MOHITE DERE, J.] [V. M. KANADE, J.]
Vinayak Halemath
1 / 1
Pankaj Kumar Singh
Tata Motors Finance Ltd.
V. M. Kanade
Revati Mohite Dere
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
