The High Court granted anticipatory bail to the applicant accused of cheating and illegal possession of arms, noting prima facie that she may have received money in her employment capacity.
Confirmed order of pre-arrest bail and directed applicant to attend Deccan Police Station every Monday between 10 a.m. to 2 p.m.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
7.ABA720_2015.doc
Vidya Amin
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 720 OF 2015
Ms. Deepali Jagannath Satoskar Vs. The State of Maharashtra
... Applicant ... Respondent
Mr. Purushottam G. Chavan, Advocate for the applicant. Mr. Arfan Sait, APP for the State. I.O. Mr. B.D. Magar, P.S.I., Deccan Police Station, Pune City present.
CORAM: MRS.MRIDULA BHATKAR, J. DATE : JULY 15, 2015
P.C.:
This Application is moved for pre-arrest bail, as the
applicant/accused is apprehending arrest in M. Case No. 11 of 2014 registered with Deccan Police Station, Pune for offences punishable under sections 406, 420, 504, 506 r/w. 34 of the Indian Penal Code and under section 4, 25 of the Arms Act..
1 / 3
7.ABA720_2015.doc
returned at all and the complainant realized that she was duped for the said amount. So, she filed a written complaint with the learned Magistrate, who gave directions under section 156(3) of Cr. P.C. to the police to investigate. Pursuant to this, police found material against principal accused Vasant Bhalwankar and present applicant/accused and coaccused. Hence, the offence was registered against the applicant/accused and other accused.
2 / 3
7.ABA720_2015.doc
(MRS.MRIDULA BHATKAR, J.)
3 / 3
2 issues framed by the court
Whether anticipatory bail should be granted to the applicant apprehending arrest in a cheating case where she claims to be an employee of the principal accused.
Whether the facts prima facie show that the applicant is a beneficiary of the investments.
3 provisions across 3 enactments
VIDYA AMIN
STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
MRIDULA BHATKAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
