This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
32-S-3461-07.DOC
Agk
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION SUIT NO. 3461 OF 2007
Amratlal Bhanji Laxman
Versus
…Plaintiff
Kusum Prabhudas Laxman & 7 Ors.…Defendants
None for the Plaintiff.
Mr. C. S. Bulsara, a/w H. N. Vakil, i/b Mulla & Mulla for the
Defendants Nos. 5, 6 and 8.
Mr. Sunil Vyas, i/b B. K. Bali for Defendant No. 7.
CORAM:G.S. PATEL, J
DATED:16th February 2015
PC:-
1.On 27th January 2015, the advocates on record for the
Plaintiff stated that they have returned the brief to the Plaintiff. I
directed the Registry to issue a notice to the Plaintiff that the matter
will be taken up today. The Registry has done so. The Plaintiff and
his advocates are absent. The suit is dismissed for non-prosecution.
(G. S. PATEL, J.)
1 of 1
Amratlal Bhanji Laxman
Kusum Prabhudas Laxman
7 Ors.
G. S. PATEL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court