The High Court of Judicature at Bombay dismissed two writ petitions filed by the Kathe family against the State of Maharashtra for want of prosecution due to non-compliance with orders dated 21 December 2013 regarding deposit of amount.
Petitions dismissed for want of prosecution; no costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
22 WP 8232-13 wt 12059-13.doc
Sequeira
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 8232 OF 2013
Dinkar Eknath Kathe & anr. .. Petitioners Vs State of Maharashtra through Minister of Co-Operation & ors. .. Respondents
Along with WRIT PETITION NO. 12059 OF 2013
Shobha Dinker Kathe. .. Petitioner Vs State of Maharashtra through Minister of Co-Operation & anr. .. Respondents
None for Petitioner.
Mr.Vishal Thadani-Assistant Government Pleader, for State-Respondent. Mr.R.S.Ghadge i/by Mr.A.S.Desai, for Respondent No.2 in both the matters.
CORAM: ANOOP V. MOHTA & N.M.JAMDAR, JJ. Tuesday 2 December, 2014.
P.C.:
None for Petitioners on 25 November 2014, and today again. Statement is made by the learned counsel appearing for Respondent No.2, that the Petitioners inspite of order dated 21 December 2013 has not deposited the amount / nor complied with the order so passed. Both these Petitions are dismissed for want of prosecution. No costs.
ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.
N.M.JAMDAR, J.
Dinkar Eknath Kathe & ors.
Shobha Dinker Kathe.
State of Maharashtra through Minister of Co-Operation & ors.
Anoop V. Mocha
N.M. Jamdar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
