B.B. Shirsat v. Union of India and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
Allowed a civil application to restore a matter for final hearing without costs.
What did the court decide?
Civil Application allowed; matter restored and listed for final hearing year-wise.
What the court decided
10 CAW 2726-14 in WP 3226-05.doc
Sequeira
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 2726 OF 2014 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 3226 OF 2005
B. B. Shirsat .. Applicant / Petitioner Vs Union of India, Through the Chief Post Master General & ors. .. Respondents
Mr.Ketan Joshi i/b Mrs.S.A.Dhamale, for Applicant.
CORAM: ANOOP V. MOHTA & N.M.JAMDAR, JJ. Tuesday 2 December, 2014.
P.C.:
Considering the averments made and as case is made out, Civil Application is allowed in terms of prayer clause (a). Matter be restored and listed for 'Final Hearing' year-wise. No costs.
ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.
N.M.JAMDAR, J.
Parties & counsel
- applicant
B. B. Shirsat
- respondent
Union of India
Coram
Anoop V. Mota
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
Nitin Ashok Chavan Vs the State of Maharashtra, through Principal Secretary, Co-Operative Dept and Ors.
Shri. Moreshwar Raghunath Deshmukh Vs the State of Maharashtra, through Additional Chief Secretary, Revenue and Forest Dept and Ors.
Maharashtra Mantralaya Officers Assocation, through President, Mr. R. K. Dhanwade and Ors. Vs State of Maharashtra, through Additional Chief Secretary (Revenue), Revenue and Forest Dept and Ors.
Dinkar Eknath Kathe and Anr. Vs State of Maharashtra, through Minister of Co-Operation and Ors.