The Bombay High Court allowed the civil application in terms of prayer clause (b) for a final hearing, dismissing the matter without costs. The application was disposed of accordingly, with future hearing scheduled year-wise after eight weeks.
Application allowed in terms of prayer clause (b); matter disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
71 CAW 2649-14 in WP 692-09.doc
Sequeira
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 2649 OF 2014 IN
WRIT PETITION NO. 692 OF 2009
Ganesh Bhumayya Battu .. Applicant / Petitioner Vs The Commissioner of Police Mumbai & anr. .. Respondents
Mr.Omkar Nagvekar i/by Mr.Ganesh K.Gole, for Applicant / Petitioner. Mr.C.P.Yadav-Assistant Government Pleader, for the Respondent Nos.1 & 2.
CORAM: ANOOP V. MOHTA & N.M.JAMDAR, JJ. Tuesday 2 December, 2014.
P.C.:
Considering the averments made and as the case is made out the application is allowed in terms of prayer clause (b). No costs. The matter be placed for 'Final hearing' year-wise after eight weeks i.e. on 27 January 2015.
Application is disposed of accordingly. No costs.
N.M.JAMDAR, J.
ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the civil application made out for final hearing needs to be allowed.
Ganesh Bhumayya Battu
The Commissioner of Police Mumbai
The second respondent
Anoop V. Mota
N. M. Jamdar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
