Respondent withdrew tender notices, rendering the writ petition nonsustainable; the petition was disposed of with no order as to costs.
Writ petition disposed with no order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 wp136.14
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR
WRIT PETITION NO.136 OF 2014.
(M/S. CENTURY COOLERS...VS..UNION OF INDIA & 2 OTH)
Mr R.M.Sharma, Advocate for Petitioner. Mrs S.W. Deshpande, Advocate for Respondent No.1. Mrs Kalyani Deshpande, A.G.P. for Respondent Nos. 2 and 4. Mr. R.N.Badhe, Advocate for Respondent No.3.
CORAM : SMT. VASANTI A. NAIK AND P.R.BORA, JJ.
DATED : AUGUST 27, 2014.
Mr. Badhe, the learned counsel for the respondent No.3 states, on instructions from the Law Officer who is personally present in the Court today, that the respondent No.3 would withdraw the tender notices dated 21.11.2013 and 19.12.2013.
In view of the aforesaid statement, nothing would survive in the writ petition.
The writ petition is disposed of with no order as
to costs.
JUDGE JUDGE
RRaut..
M/s. Century Coolers
Union of India
Vasanti A. Naik
P.R. Bora
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
