The petition challenging the Maharashtra Standards of Weights and Measures (Enforcement) Amendment Rules, 2000 was disposed of. The Court accepted an affidavit stating the State had shifted its enforcement to the Legal Metrology Act, 2009 and Rules, 2011, rendering the impugned rules inoperative.
Rule is discharged.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
207-wp-6243-01.doc
1
Ladda
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION No. 6243 of 2001.
Shaikh Mohmedali Abdul Rehman … Petitioner
V/s.
State of Maharashtra and others … Respondents
Mr S.G. Kudle for the Petitioner
Mr V.S. Gokhale, AGP for the Respondent Nos. 1 to 3.
CORAM : A.S. OKA & A.S.CHANDURKAR, JJ. DATE : 16th July, 2014.
P.C.
1 of 2
2 207-wp-6243-01.doc
that the Rule 12 of the said Rules of 2011 makes a provision for verification of weights and measures at the periodical intervals. A categorical statement made in paragraph 6 is that now the State is following the provisions of said Act of 2009 and the said Rules of 2011 effective from 28th April,2011.
(A.S.CHANDURKAR, J) ( A.S. OKA, J )
2 of 2
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the State was still implementing the impugned Maharashtra Standards of Weights and Measures (Enforcement) Amendment Rules, 2000.
4 provisions across 4 enactments
Shaikh Mohmedali Abdul Rehman
State of Maharashtra
A.S. Oka
A.S. Chandurkar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
