Supreme Court upheld the Bombay High Court's ruling quashing the charges against the accused, holding that the FIR was registered based on false and fabricated material.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
20-wp6055.12.sxw
ssm 1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 6055 OF 2012
Shri Vishwajit Kashiram Ghag
….Petitioner.
Vs.
The State Government & Ors.
….Respondents.
Mr. Abhijeet Naik i/by Mr. Rajesh Khobragade for the Petitioner. Mr. A.I. Patel, AGP for the Respondent-State.
CORAM : ANOOP V. MOHTA AND
A.A. SAYED, JJ. DATE : 5 AUGUST 2014.
P.C.:-
The learned counsel appearing for the Petitioner, on
instructions, seeks to withdraw the present Petition to avail the appropriate remedy for claiming compensation from the Respondents.
2 The Writ Petition is accordingly disposed of as withdrawn,
with liberty. No costs.
(A.A. SAYED, J.) (ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.)
1/1
Shri Vishwajit Kashiram Ghag
The State Government & Ors.
Anoop V. Mota
A. A. Sayed
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
