Petitioner sought a direction to open a Girls Hostel at Vengurla. The Court directed the State to decide the petitioner's representation within four weeks.
Directed Respondent no.2 to decide the representation regarding opening of Girls Hostel within four weeks.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
PIL158.14
krs
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO.158 OF 2014
Shri Mahesh Lumaji Parulekar V/s.
State of Maharashtra & Anr. : Respondents
Ms Rani A. Patil with Mr.Virendra Neve for the Petitioner.
Ms S.S. Bhende, Asstt. Govt. Pleader for the Respondents.
CORAM : ANOOP V. MOHTA & A.A. SAYED, JJ.
DATE : AUGUST 04, 2014.
P.C.:
Rule, returnable forthwith.
Ms Bhende, learned Asstt. Govt. Pleader waives service for the Respondents.
Heard finally by consent of parties.
present PIL by directing Respondent no.2 to decide the representations as early as possible preferably within four weeks, in accordance with law.
1 of 2
PIL158.14
krs
( ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.)
(A.A. SAYED, J.)
2 of 2
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the State should be directed to open a Girls Hostel at Vengurla given the readiness of facilities and earlier representations.
Shri Mahesh Lumaji Parulekar
State of Maharashtra
Anoop V. Mota
A. A. Sayed
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
