The High Court dismissed a Writ Petition challenging the dismissal of an appeal against a suit for partition. The petitioners argued the property was joint family property, but the Court found no ground for interference as the lower courts examined the evidence plausibly.
The Writ Petition is dismissed. No costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 W.P. 593.2014
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO. 593 OF 2014
Subhash Sitaram Haran & Ors. V/s Pandurang Sitaram Haran
Office Notes,Office Court's or Judge's orders Memoranda of Coram,appearances, ................................ Court's orders or CORAM : S.V.GANGAPURWALA, J. directions and Registrar's orders DATE : 21/01/2014
Mr. G.G.Suryawanshi, Advocate for the Petitioners.
COURT'S ORDER :
2 W.P. 593.2014
3 W.P. 593.2014
[ S.V.GANGAPURWALA, J. ]
KNP/W.P. 593.2014
3 issues framed by the court
Whether the High Court should interfere with the District Court's dismissal of the appeal in a partition suit.
Whether the family property remained joint family property despite revenue records showing the respondent's name.
If the trial court and lower appellate court passed the impugned order in a legally plausible manner warranting no interference.
Subhash Sitaram Haran & Ors.
Pandurang Sitaram Haran
S.V. Gangapurwala
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
