that the Courts below have failed to consider the relevant aspect of the matter. The suit plot was allotted to the opponent No. 2 and in the meeting dated 15/12/1982, the membership of opponent No. 2 is cancelled. The disputant has filed application with the Society for grant of membership of plot No. 45 and an endorsement was made on the said application about society's decision to allot plot No. 45. The letter is also issued to the father of the disputant. There are voluminous documents to show that the application of the membership of the present petitioner has been granted and plot No. 45 was allotted to the petitioner. All these letters are not considered by the Court. After passing of the order, the matter proceeded further. Till December, 2013 the respondent did not do any activity on the suit plot, however subsequently he started changing the nature of the suit property. As such the petitioner moved the Court.