In this writ petition, petitioners sought directions to expeditiously decide their application for re-determination of land compensation under section 28A of the Land Acquisition Act.
Direction to respondent to decide application under section 28A of the Land Acquisition Act expeditiously within two months and pay compensation.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
wp5874.14.doc
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO. 5874 OF 2013
Balaji s/o Maruti Chendake & others .. PETITIONERS
VERSUS
The State of Maharashtra & another .. RESPONDENTS
Mr. V. V. Ingale, advocate for petitioners. Mr. S. K. Tambe, AGP for the State.
CORAM : R.M. BORDE & V. L. ACHLIYA, JJ. DATE : 4th JULY, 2014.
PER COURT :
application tendered by them seeking re-determination of compensation payable in respect of acquired land under section 28A of the Land Acquisition Act, expeditiously.
wp5874.14.doc
2
with the award of the Land Acquisition officer within time stipulated as above.
( V. L. ACHLIYA ) ( R. M. BORDE ) JUDGE JUDGE
dyb
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the respondent must expedite the decision on the application for re-determination of compensation under section 28A of the Land Acquisition Act?
Whether a pending civil application survives the disposal of this petition.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Balaji s/o Maruti Chendake & others
The State of Maharashtra
another
R.M. Borde
V.L. Achliya
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
