The writ petition was disposed of as infructuous over the passage of time. The rule was discharged with no award of costs.
Rule discharged; no costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 wp3021-99.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO.3021/1999
M/S V.S.Dube & Co. Beed .. Petitioner Versus The State of Maha. & Ors .. Respondents
Shri D.B.Pokale h/f Shri S.S.Choudhari,Adv.for petitioner Smt.S.G.Chincholkar,AGP for respondent State. Shri Anand Bhandari,Adv. for R.6
CORAM : R.M.BORDE & V.L.ACHLIYA,JJ. DATED: 3rd July, 2014
PER COURT :-
The counsel appearing for petitioner states that by passage of time, Writ Petition has rendered infructuous. Writ Petition stands disposed of having been rendered infructuous. Rule discharged. There shall be no costs.
[V.L.ACHLIYA,J.] [R.M.BORDE,J.]
umg
M/S V.S.Dube & Co.
The State of Maha.
R.M.BORDE
V.L.ACHLIYA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
