Allowed

Ashokrao Mane Polytechnic, Save, by Shri. Balasaheb Mane Shikshan Prasarak Mandal, through Secretar v. Directorate of Technical Education, Maharashtra State and Ors.

Bombay HC9 Jul 2014WP/5811/2014

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Court allowed petitioner s writ petition regarding admission procedure, ruling it identical to a similar case decided on the same day and granting approval for Centralised Admission Procedure.

What did the court decide?

Directing Respondent No.2 to issue Government Resolution and Respondent No.1 to include petitioner in Centralised Admission Procedure (CAP).

Ashokrao Mane Polytechnic, Save, by Shri. Balasaheb… — Education and Admissions | Bombay HC (2014)

¶1

914 wp 5811.14 as.doc

¶2

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

¶4

WRIT PETITION NO.5811 OF 2014

¶5

Ashokrao Mane Polytechnic, Save An Educational Institution Established by Shri Balasaheb Mane Shikshan Prasarak Mandal

¶6

... Petitioner.

¶7

V/s.

¶8

Directorate of Technical Education & Ors.

¶9

... Respondents.

¶10

Mr. S.C. Naidu a/w Mr. Y.C. Naidu and Mr. Rahul Tanwani i/b M/s. C.R. Naidu & Co. for the Petitioner.

¶11

Mr. S.S. Bhende, AGP for RespondentsState.

¶12

Mr. Sariputta Sarnath a/w Mr. Swaraj Jadhav for Respondent no.3 – AICTE.

¶13

CORAM: ANOOP V. MOHTA & A.A. SAYED, JJ. DATED : JULY 9, 2014.

¶14

P.C. :

¶15

Rule, returnable forthwith. Heard finally by consent of parties.

¶16

Both the Counsel make a statement that the issues involved in

¶17

this Petition are identical to the issues involved in Writ Petition no.5816 of 2014 (Dr. D.Y. Patil Pratishthan's Padmashree Dr. D.Y. Patil Polytechnic V/s. Directorate of Technical Education, Maharashtra State & Ors), which Writ Petition has been allowed by judgment and order dated 9^th July, 2014.

¶18

1/2

¶19

914 wp 5811.14 as.doc

¶20

¶21

Therefore, for the reasons stated in the aforesaid order dated 9^th July, 2014, the present Petition is allowed in terms of prayer clauses a(i) and (ii) as under:

¶22

“a) (i) the Respondent No.2 in it's Higher & Technical Education Department to forthwith issue appropriate Government Resolution/Notification recording the approval granted by AICTE to the Petitioner Institution for A.Y. 201415;

¶23

(ii) the Respondent No.1 to forthwith include the Petitioner in Centralised Admission Procedure (CAP) for First Year Engineering Courses (Diploma) as approved by AICTE for A.Y. 20142015 and to issue Institute Code and further display the name of petitioner on its web portal along with Institute Information, course wise sanctioned intake & choice codes.”

¶24

4 Rule made absolute accordingly. No costs.

¶25

5 It is made clear that the Petitioner Institution shall comply with other obligations/formalities, if any.

¶26

katkam

¶27

2/2

Ashokrao Mane Polytechnic, Save, by Shri. Balasaheb Mane Shikshan Prasarak Mandal, through Secretar v. Directorate of Technical Education, Maharashtra State and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ashokrao Mane Polytechnic, Save, by Shri. Balasaheb Mane Shikshan Prasarak Mandal, through Secretar v. Directorate of Technical Education, Maharashtra State and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Dr. D. Y. Patil Pratishthans College of Engineering, through Secretary, Mr. S. S. Dharamghutti Vs Directorate of Technical Education, Maharashtra State and Ors.

Dinkarrao K. Shinde Samark Trust, Dr. a. D. Shinde College of Engineering Vs State of Maharashtra, through Secretary, Dept of Higher and Technical Education and Ors.

Padmashri Dr. D. Y. Patil Institute of Engineering Management and Research, by Dr. D. Y. Patil Prat Vs Directorate of Technical Education, Maharashtra State and Ors.

Shri. Ravindra Shrirang Bargal Vs the Member Secretary, Maharashtra Jeevan Pradhikaran and Ors.

Dr. D. Y. Patil Pratishthans Padmashree Dr. D. Y. Patil Polytechnic, through Secretary and Trustee Vs Directorate of Technical Education, Maharashtra State and Ors.

The Maharashtra Education and Sports Academy, Chandgad and Anr. Vs Directorate of Technical Education, Maharashtra State and Ors.