Dismissed

Dinkarrao K. Shinde Samark Trust, Dr. a. D. Shinde College of Engineering v. State of Maharashtra, through Secretary, Dept of Higher and Technical Education and Ors.

Bombay HC8 Jul 2014WP/6176/2014

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

High Court disposed of multiple writ petitions where petitioners claimed permission was granted for the 2014-15 academic year. Court directed deletion of negative remarks on the DTE portal and reserved costs.

What did the court decide?

Directed respondent to delete remarks on web-portal regarding petitioners' institutions immediately.

Dinkarrao K. Shinde Samark Trust, Dr. a. D. Shinde… — Education and Admissions | Bombay HC (2014)

¶1

21wp5810.14gp.sxw

¶2

ssm 1

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

¶4

APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL JURISDICTION

¶5

WRIT PETITION NO. 5810 OF 2014

¶6

Dr. D.Y. Patil Pratishthans College of Engineering, ….Petitioners.

¶7

Vs.

¶8

Directorate of Technical Education & Ors. ….Respondents.

¶9

WITH

¶10

WRIT PETITION NO. 6031 OF 2014

¶11

PimpriChinchwad Educationl Trust ….Petitioners.

¶12

Vs.

¶13

Directorate of Technical Education & Ors. ….Respondents.

¶14

WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 6059 OF 2014

¶15

Ramrao Adik Institute of Technology ….Petitioners.

¶16

Vs.

¶17

State of Maharashtra & Ors. ….Respondents.

¶18

WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 6060 OF 2014

¶19

Dr. D.Y. Patil Institute of Engineering and Technology & Arn. ….Petitioners. Vs. State of Maharashtra & Ors. ….Respondents.

¶20

WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 6061 OF 2014

¶21

Mahatma Education Society's Pillai's HOC College of Engineering and Technology ….Petitioners. Vs.

¶22

1/4

¶23

ssm 2 21wp5810.14gp.sxw State of Maharashtra & Ors. ….Respondents.

¶24

WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 6167 OF 2014

¶25

Dr. D.Y. Patil Educational Federation ….Petitioners. Vs.

¶26

State of Maharashtra & Ors. ….Respondents.

¶27

WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 6176 OF 2014

¶28

Dinkarrao K. Shinde Samark Trust, Dr. A.D. Shinde College of Engineering ….Petitioners. Vs. State of Maharashtra & Ors. ….Respondents.

¶29

WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 6178 OF 2014

¶30

Ramrao Adik Institute of Technology ….Petitioners. Vs. State of Maharashtra & Ors. ….Respondents.

¶31

WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 6179 OF 2014

¶32

Dr. D.Y. Patil Educational Academy ….Petitioners. Vs. State of Maharashtra & Ors. ….Respondents.

¶33

WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 6203 OF 2014

¶34

Dr. D.Y. Patil College of Engineering & Technology, Kolhapur ….Petitioners. Vs. State of Maharashtra & Ors. ….Respondents.

WITH

2/4

21wp5810.14gp.sxw

ssm 3

WRIT PETITION NO. 6204 OF 2014

¶40

Padmashri Dr. D.Y. Patil Institute of Engineering, Management & Research

¶41

….Petitioners.

¶42

Vs.

¶43

Directorate of Technical Education & Ors. ….Respondents.

¶44

Mr. S.C. Naidu a/w Mr. Y.C. Naidu with Mr. Rahul Tanwani for the Petitioners in WP Nos.5810 of 2014, 6031 of 2014, 6203 of 2014 and 6204 of 2014.

¶45

Mr. S.S. Patwardhan a/w Mr. Ruturaj Pawar for the Petitioners in WP Nos.6060 of 2014, 6167 of 2014, 6176 of 2014, 6178 of 2014, 6179 of 2014 and 6059 of 2014.

¶46

Mr. C.K. Thomas i/by C.K. Thomas & Associates for the Petitioners in WP No. 6061 of 2014.

¶47

Mr. Mihir Desai a/w Mr. Sariputta Sarnath for AICTE in all the Petitions.

¶48

Ms. S.S. Bhende, AGP for the State and Directorate of Technical Education in all the matters.

¶49

CORAM : ANOOP V. MOHTA AND

¶50

A.A. SAYED, JJ.

¶51

DATE : 8 JULY 2014.

¶52

P.C.:

¶53

Writ Petition No. 6204 of 2014 is not on board.

¶54

Mentioned. In view of urgency shown, taken on board.

¶55

2 The learned counsel appearing for the Petitioners makes

¶56

statement that in all the above Petitions, Respondent Nos. 1 and 2 i.e. Director of Technical Education and State of Maharashtra vide

¶57

3/4

¶58

ssm 4 21wp5810.14gp.sxw

¶59

Government Resolution No. TEM2014/Pra.Kra.149/Tashi4 dated 3 July 2014 have granted permission in favour of the petitioners as they prayed for the academic year 20142015, therefore, nothing survive in these Petitions.

¶60

3 The learned AGP for the State, on instructions, makes statement that the remarks made on the webportal of DTE referring to the Petitioners' institution shall be deleted immediately. It is made clear that, the Petitioners need to fulfill/comply with all the formalities including the payment, if any.

¶61

4 In view of above, all the Writ Petitions are disposed of.

¶62

There shall be no order as to costs.

¶63

(A.A. SAYED, J.) (ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.)

¶64

4/4

Dinkarrao K. Shinde Samark Trust, Dr. a. D. Shinde College of Engineering v. State of Maharashtra, through Secretary, Dept of Higher and Technical Education and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Dinkarrao K. Shinde Samark Trust, Dr. a. D. Shinde College of Engineering v. State of Maharashtra, through Secretary, Dept of Higher and Technical Education and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M/S. Sang Sugar Corpn. Vs Muncipal Corpn. of Gr. Mumbai and Ors.

Apsara Cold Drink House Vs Municipal Corporation of Gr. Mumbai

M/S.R.K.Builders and Anr. Vs Smt Manda Suryakant Lande and 8 Ors.

Dr. D. Y. Patil Pratishthans College of Engineering, through Secretary, Mr. S. S. Dharamghutti Vs Directorate of Technical Education, Maharashtra State and Ors.

Padmashri Dr. D. Y. Patil Institute of Engineering Management and Research, by Dr. D. Y. Patil Prat Vs Directorate of Technical Education, Maharashtra State and Ors.

Jay Bajrang Pratisthan, through Secretary, Shri. Rahul R. Khokale Vs Union of India, through Secretary, Dept of School Education and Literacy and Ors.