Allowed

The Maharashtra Education and Sports Academy, Chandgad and Anr. v. Directorate of Technical Education, Maharashtra State and Ors.

Bombay HC9 Jul 2014WP/5807/2014

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Judicature at Bombay allowed the writ petition by consent of parties, applying the reasons from an identical petition allowed on the same day. The petitioner institution was directed to have new diploma courses approved and listed on its portal with mandated seat intakes for the academic year 2014-15. No costs were awarded.

What did the court decide?

Writ of Mandamus directing the Directorate of Technical Education to approve new diploma courses with specified intakes and the petitioner institution to publish and display them on its web portal for

The Maharashtra Education and Sports Academy… — Education and Admissions | Bombay HC (2014)

¶1

912 wp 5807.14 as.doc

¶2

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

¶4

WRIT PETITION NO.5807 OF 2014

¶5

THE MAHARASHTRA EDUCATION &

¶6

SPORTS ACADEMY, CHANDGAD

¶7

AND ANR. … PETITIONERS

¶8

V/s.

¶9

DIRECTORATE OF TECHNICAL EDUCATION & OTHERS ….RESPONDENTS

¶10

Mr. Nitin Dhumal for the Petitioners. Mr. S.S. Bhende, AGP for RespondentsState.

¶11

Mr. Sariputta Sarnath a/w Mr. Swaraj Jadhav for Respondent no.3 – AICTE.

¶12

CORAM: ANOOP V. MOHTA & A.A. SAYED, JJ. DATED : JULY 9, 2014.

¶13

P.C. :

¶14

Rule, returnable forthwith. Heard finally by consent of parties.

¶15

Both the Counsel make a statement that the issues involved in this Petition are identical to the issues involved in Writ Petition no.5816 of 2014 (Dr. D.Y. Patil Pratishthan's Padmashree Dr. D.Y. Patil Polytechnic V/s. Directorate of Technical Education,

¶16

Maharashtra State & Ors), which Writ Petition has been allowed by judgment and order dated 9^th July, 2014.

¶17

1/3

¶18

912 wp 5807.14 as.doc

¶19

¶20

Therefore, for the reasons stated in the aforesaid order dated 9^th July, 2014, the present Petition is allowed in terms of prayer clauses (a) and (b) as under:

¶21

“a) For a Writ of Mandamus or a Writ in the nature of Mandamus or any other appropriate Writ, direction or Order under Article 226 and Article 227 of the Constitution of India directing the Respondent No.2 in it's Higher & Technical Education Department to forthwith issue appropriate Govt. Resolution approving new diploma Courses in i) Mechanical Engineering with intake of 120 seats, II) Civil Engineering iii) Electrical Engineering, and iv) Electronics and Telecommunication Engineering with intake of 60 seats each in the Petitioner No. 2 “MAHADEVRAO WANDRE POLYTECHNIC, AT WAITKWADI, TALCHANDGAD, DIST. KOLHAPUR, publish the same in Government Gazette;

¶22

b) By issuing appropriate Writ or directions, the Respondent No. 1 be directed to forthwith display the new diploma courses in i) Mechanical Engineering with intake of 120 seats, II) Civil Engineering iii) Electrical Engineering, and iv) Electronics and Telecommunication Engineering with intake of 60 seats each in the Petitioner No. 2 “MAHADEVRAO WANDRE POLYTECHNIC”, at Waitkwadi, TalChandgad Dist. Kolhapur for the A.Y. 201415 on its web portal be listed along with Institute Information, course wise sanctioned intake and choice codes”.

¶23

2/3

¶24

912 wp 5807.14 as.doc

¶25

¶26

4 Rule made absolute accordingly. No costs.

¶27

5 It is made clear that the Petitioner Institution shall comply with

¶28

other obligations/formalities, if any.

¶29

(A.A. SAYED, J.) (ANOOP V. MOHTA , J. )

¶30

katkam

¶31

3/3

The Maharashtra Education and Sports Academy, Chandgad and Anr. v. Directorate of Technical Education, Maharashtra State and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

The Maharashtra Education and Sports Academy, Chandgad and Anr. v. Directorate of Technical Education, Maharashtra State and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Dr. D. Y. Patil Pratishthans College of Engineering, through Secretary, Mr. S. S. Dharamghutti Vs Directorate of Technical Education, Maharashtra State and Ors.

Dinkarrao K. Shinde Samark Trust, Dr. a. D. Shinde College of Engineering Vs State of Maharashtra, through Secretary, Dept of Higher and Technical Education and Ors.

Padmashri Dr. D. Y. Patil Institute of Engineering Management and Research, by Dr. D. Y. Patil Prat Vs Directorate of Technical Education, Maharashtra State and Ors.

Shri. Ravindra Shrirang Bargal Vs the Member Secretary, Maharashtra Jeevan Pradhikaran and Ors.

Dr. D. Y. Patil Pratishthans Padmashree Dr. D. Y. Patil Polytechnic, through Secretary and Trustee Vs Directorate of Technical Education, Maharashtra State and Ors.

Ashokrao Mane Polytechnic, Save, by Shri. Balasaheb Mane Shikshan Prasarak Mandal, through Secretar Vs Directorate of Technical Education, Maharashtra State and Ors.