Court disposed of an old writ petition on the ground that due to the passage of time, no substantive matter survives in the petition.
Petition disposed of as no matter survives due to passage of time.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO. 3795 OF 2000
Devaji Gopala Ingle
Petitioner
V E R S U S
The State of Maharashtra & Ors.
Respondents
Mr. Amol B. Chalak, Advocate, holding for
Mr. S.B. Talekar, Advocate for the petitioner
Mrs. A.V. Gondhalekar, AGP for the respondent/State
Shri Vivek Dhage, Advocate for respondent no.4
Shri S.S. Choudhari, Advocate for respondent no.5
CORAM : A. V. NIRGUDE &
A.I.S. CHEEMA, JJ.
DATE : 1st September, 2014
PER COURT :
Due to passage of time, nothing survives in
this petition, hence, the petition stands disposed of.
(A.I.S. CHEEMA, J.) (A.V. NIRGUDE, J.)
SRM/1/9/14
Devaji Gopala Ingle
The State of Maharashtra & Ors.
A. V. NIRGUDE
A.I.S. CHEEMA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court