Joint disposal of eight writ petitions challenging refusals to grant school recognition. The court disposed of all petitions as they were filed after the respondents had already secured permission and been running schools for over a decade.
All writ petitions and connected civil applications stood disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 WP1352/2000 & 8 petitions
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO. 1352 OF 2000
Hameed Qureshi Educatiional and
WelfareSociety,Osmanpura,
Aurangabad
Petitioner
V E R S U S
The State of Maharashtra & Ors.
Respondents
Mr. Zia-Ul-Mustafa, Advocate for the petitioner
Mr. S.G. Karlekar, AGP for the respondent/State
Mr. A.S. Bajaj, Advocate for respondent no.4
WITH
WRIT PETITION NO. 2746 OF 2001
Shri Sant Govindbaba Shikshan
Prasarak Mandal, Parbhani
Petitioner
V E R S U S
The State of Maharashtra & Ors.
Respondents
Mr. V.M. Chate, Advocate for the petitioner
Mr. S.G. Karlekar, AGP for the respondent/State
Mr. R.R. Suryawanshi, Advocate for respondent no.5
WITH
WRIT PETITION NO. 2987 OF 2001
Shri Ganesh Shikshan Prasarak
Mandal, Ganeshwadi, Post. Sonai,
Taluka Newasa, Dist. Ahmednagar
Petitioner
V E R S U S
The State of Maharashtra & Ors.
Respondents
Mr. S.B. Bhapkar, Advocate for the petitioner
Mr. S.G. Karlekar, AGP for the respondent/State
Mr. a.B. Kale, Advocate for respondent no.4
2 WP1352/2000 & 8 petitions
WITH
WRIT PETITION NO. 2990 OF 2001
Shivaji Education Society, Nava,
Taluka and Dist. Jalna
Petitioner
V E R S U S
The State of Maharashtra & Ors.
Respondents
Mr. B.A. Dhengle, Advocate for the petitioner
Mr. S.G. Karlekar, AGP for the respondent/State
WITH
WRIT PETITION NO. 2992 OF 2001
Tagore Shikshan Samiti
Petitioner
V E R S U S
The State of Maharashtra & Ors.
Respondent
Mr. S.B. Talekar, Advocate for the petitioner
Mr. S.G. Karlekar, AGP for the respondents/State
WITH
WRIT PETITION NO. 3186 OF 2001
Gundaji Namdeorao Shinde
Petitioner
V E R S U S
The State of Maharashtra & Ors.
Respondent
Mr. N.P. Patil Jamalpurkar, Advocate for the petitioner
Mr. S.G. Karlekar, AGP for the respondents/State
Mr. V.D. Gunale, Advocate for respondent nos.6 to 10
WITH
WRIT PETITION NO. 3210 OF 2001
Shramik Janta Shikshan Prasarak
Mandal, Chalisgaon
Petitioner
V E R S U S
The State of Maharashtra & Ors.
Respondent
Mr. V.G. Sakolkar, Advocate for the petitioner
Mr. S.G. Karlekar, AGP for the respondents/State
Mr. P.R. Patil, Advocate for respondent no.4
WITH
WRIT PETITION NO. 4078 OF 2001
Shri Sai Shikshan Sanstha, Jamkhed
Petitioner
V E R S U S
The State of Maharashtra & Ors.
Respondent
Mr. T.B. Bhosale, Advocate for the petitioner
Mr. S.G. Karlekar, AGP for the respondents/State
Mr. N.C. Garud, Advocate for respondent no.4
Mr. B.T. Bodkhe, Advocate for respondent no.5
WITH
WRIT PETITION NO. 5165 OF 2001
Shri Kamakshi Shikshan Sanstha,
Kamargaon, Taluka and District
Ahmednagar
Petitioner
V E R S U S
The State of Maharashtra & Ors.
Respondent
Mr. B.V. Dhage, Advocate for the petitioner
Mr. S.G. Karlekar, AGP for the respondents/State
Mrs. A.N. Ansari, Advocate for respondent no.5
4 WP1352/2000 & 8 petitions
CORAM : A. V. NIRGUDE &
A.I.S. CHEEMA, JJ.
DATE : 1st September, 2014
PER COURT :
1.Due to passage of time, nothing survives in
these petitions. The respondents received permission
to run the school. They are running their schools for
last more than 10 years. If the petitioners are
interested in starting new school in the changed
circumstances, they may apply afresh. In view of
this, all petitions stand disposed of.
2.In view of disposal of above petitions, Civil
Application Nos.996 of 2003, 3836 of 2005 and 3648 of
2006 stand disposed of.
(A.I.S. CHEEMA, J.) (A.V. NIRGUDE, J.)
SRM/1/9/14
Hameed Qureshi Educational and Welfare Society
State of Maharashtra
A. V. Nirgude
A.I.S. Cheema
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court