Leave to withdraw the filed writ petition is granted. The petition is allowed to be withdrawn and disposed of accordingly. The rule is discharged with no order as to costs.
Leave to withdraw the writ petition granted; petition allowed to be withdrawn and disposed of; rule discharged with no order as to costs; interim order vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
WP 3422/99
- 1 -
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO.3422/1999
Sudhakar Ukhardu Sapkal.
...Petitioner..
Versus
The State of Maharashtra & others.
...Respondents...
.....
Shri U.R. Awate, Advocate h/f Shri S.B. Talekar, Advocate
for petitioner.
Shri S.G. Karlekar, AGP for respondent nos.1 & 3.
Shri A.B. Girase, Advocate for respondent no.4.
.....
CORAM: S.C. DHARMADHIKARI & RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, JJ.
DATE: 17.02.2014
ORDER :
In terms of the written instructions received by the
petitioner's Advocate, leave to withdraw the writ
petition is granted. Writ petition is allowed to be
withdrawn and stands disposed of as such. Rule is
discharged with no order as to costs. Interim order, if
any, to stand vacated forthwith.
(RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, J.) (S.C. DHARMADHIKARI, J.)
ndk/c17214
Sudhakar Ukhardu Sapkal
The State of Maharashtra
S.C. Dharmadhikari
Ravindra V. Ghuge
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court