Disposed
Atmaram Shesrao Hinge v. the State of Maharashtra and Ors.
Bombay HCWP/2461/2011
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
( 1 )
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO.2461 OF 2011
Atmaram Shesrao Hinge
PETITIONER
VERSUS
The State of Maharashtra
and others RESPONDENTS
Mr.Kuldeep Patil h/f. Mr.C.M.Kajale Advocate for petitioner. Mr.S.G.Karlekar, Advocate for respondent Nos. 1 to 3. Mr.T.B.Bhosale, Advocate for respondent No.4.
(CORAM : S.C.DHARMADHIKARI AND RAVINDRA V.GHUGE, JJ.)
DATE : 14/02/2014
PER COURT :
claim of the petitioner for rental compensation is enquired into. The
quantum would be determined and the requisite orders and directions would be passed within a period of 2 (two) weeks from today. If that is done and the quantum is communicated to the Acquiring Body, then, within a period of 3 (three) months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, the Acquiring Body should pay
( 2 )
the sum to the claimant and produce the requisite proof before the
Land Acquisition Officer.
as to costs.
( RAVINDRA V.GHUGE, J.) ( S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J. )
khs/Feb,2014/wp2461-11
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petitioner is entitled to rental compensation for land acquired?
Atmaram Shesrao Hinge
The State of Maharashtra
S.C.Dharmadhikari
Ravindra V.Ghuge
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court