Writ petition filed seeking eligibility for pension remaining infructuous due to non-appearance and passage of time. The court dismissed the petition as it no longer deserved relief and discharged the rule.
None. Petition dismissed; rule discharged.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 wp1832-98.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO.1832/1998
Anil Gangadharrao Songire and others .. Petitioners Versus The State of Maha. & Ors .. Respondents
… Shri V.H.Dighe,AGP for Respondent State Shri P.S.Dighe h/f Shri R.N.Dhorde,Adv.for R.5 & 6.
CORAM : R.M.BORDE & V.L.ACHLIYA,JJ. DATED: 3rd July, 2014
PER COURT :-
Court service notice is served on the petitioner, however, he has not caused appearance in the matter. Even otherwise, by passage of time, relief claimed in the petition does not deserve to be granted and the Petition has rendered infructuous. Writ Petition as such stands dismissed. Rule discharged. There shall be no order as to costs.
[V.L.ACHLIYA,J.] [R.M.BORDE,J.]
umg
Anil Gangadharrao Songire and others
The State of Maha.
R.M.BORDE
V.L.ACHLIYA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
