Disposals of two civil applications. In one, documents sought were granted as part of the record. In the other, substantive prayers were denied at the interim stage.
Prayer in CAW 1043 allowed; CAW 3142 dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
caw1043-12
1
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No . IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR
Civil Application W No. 1043 of 2012 in
WRIT PETITON No. 6112 OF 2010
Rekha Shivramji Lakhorkar.
vrs.
State of Mah. Through its Secretary, Mantralaya, Mumbai and others.
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders
Court's or Judge's orders
CORAM : SMT. VASANTI A. NAIK AND P.R. BORA, JJ. DATE : 23rd SEPTEMBER , 2014 .
The learned counsel for the applicant states that the documents sought to be produced were a part of the record before the Maharashtra Administrative Tribunal.
In view of the aforesaid, the prayer made in the civil application is granted. The amendment should be carried out within a period of one week. Civil application is allowed and disposed of.
CAW 3142/2011
The prayers made in the application are the substantive prayers made in the writ petition. The prayers cannot be granted at the interim stage. Hence, the civil application stands disposed of.
JUDGE JUDGE
Hirekhan
Rekha Shivramji Lakhorkar
State of Maharashtra
Vasanti A. Naik
P.R. Bora
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
