The High Court granted leave to the petitioner to withdraw the writ petition under No. 2720 of 2011. The petition was dismissed as withdrawn. Any pending civil application was disposed of and stood terminated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURNAGABAD
Office Notes, Memoranda of Coram, COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS appearances, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s Orders.
44 WRIT PETITION NO. 2720 OF 2011
NAVNATH AABARAO TUPE VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS
... Advocate for Petitioner : Mr. N. B. Narwade . GP for Respondents: Mr. S. V. Kurundkar Advocate for Respondents 2 to 4 : Mr. S. B. Deshpande
CORAM : R. M. BORDE & V.L. ACHLIYA, JJ. Dated: June 10, 2014
PER COURT :
( V.L. ACHLIYA, J. ) ( R. M. BORDE, J. ) … dyb
NAVNATH AABARAO TUPE
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
R. M. BORDE
V.L. ACHLIYA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
