The petitioner sought leave to withdraw the writ petition. The High Court of Judicature at Aurangabad granted leave and disposed of the petition as withdrawn without any substantive discussion.
Leave to withdraw the petition was granted. The writ petition was disposed of as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
wp45211.odt
{1}
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO.452 OF 2011
Khaja Osmanuddin s/o Khaja Aminuddin
Petitioner
Versus
The State of Maharashtra & another
Respondents
Mr Quadri Taher Ali, advocate holding for Mr.Zia-Ul-Mustafa, advocate for the petitioner. Mr.S.G.Karlekar, A.G.P. for Respondent No.1. Smt.R.D.Reddy, advocate for Respondent No.2.
CORAM : R.M.BORDE &
V.L.ACHLIYA, JJ. DATE :09th June, 2014
PER COURT:
1 Learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner, on instructions, seeks leave to withdraw the petition.
2 Leave granted. Writ Petition stands disposed of as
withdrawn.
V.L.ACHLIYA JUDGE
R.M.BORDE
JUDGE
adb/wp45211
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Khaja Osmanuddin s/o Khaja Aminuddin
The State of Maharashtra
another
R.M.BORDE
V.L.ACHLIYA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
