This single-line order disposed of a writ petition wherein the petitioner failed to report instructions and a letter was returned as unclaimed; the petition was disposed of without costs.
Writ petition disposed of with no order as to costs; rule discharged.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
wp2624-97
1
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No . IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR
WRIT PETITION No. 2624 OF 1997 Rekha w/o Laxzman Umredkar
Vrs.
Maharashtra State Electricity Board through Supdt Engineer and one another.
None for the petitioner. Shri Moharir, counsel for respondent no. 1. Mrs. S.W. Deshpande, counsel for respondent no.2.
CORAM : SMT. VASANTI A. NAIK AND V.K. JADHAV, JJ.
DATE : 3 RD JULY , 2014 .
The counsel for the petitioner has filed a pursis St. No. 6447/2014. It is stated in the pursis that the letter issued to the petitioner on 12.6.2014 was received back with an endorsement “unclaimed”. It is further stated that the petitioner has not reported any instructions to the counsel.
In view of the aforesaid, the writ petition is disposed of, with no order as to costs.
Rule stands discharged.
JUDGE JUDGE
Hirekhan
Rekha w/o Laxzman Umredkar
Maharashtra State Electricity Board
Vasanti A. Naik
V.K. Jadhav
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
