The bench adjourned hearing of a civil application by the appellant, granting priority to pending first appeals by a young couple over the older applicants before disposing of the current matter.
Civil application rejected; first appeal listed for final hearing.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
FA374-09
1
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No . IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR
C.A.F. NO.2627/2012 IN FIRST APPEAL NO. 374/2009
(VINAY SHAMRAO SAWARKAR VERSUS ANITA VINAY SAWARKAR)
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders
Court's or Judge's orders
Shri Anand Parchure & Shri A.V. Khare, counsel for the appellant. Shri P.S. Chavan, counsel for the respondent.
CORAM : SMT. VASANTI A. NAIK AND V.K. JADHAV, JJ.
DATE : JULY 2, 2014.
Heard.
The parties are more than 50 years of age. The first appeals are already admitted and the first appeals of young couples, aged 25 and 30, are pending in this Court for hearing. This Court would rather hear the first appeals of the parties who are young.
Hence, the civil application is rejected.
The first appeal may be listed for final hearing along with First Appeal Nos.791/2007 and 467/2012, in the regular course.
JUDGE JUDGE
APTE
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a civil application for priority hearing of older parties should be allowed pending younger parties' appeals.
Vinay Shamrao Sawarkar
Anita Vinay Sawarkar
Vasanti A. Naik
V.K. Jadhav
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
