On the petitioners counsel seeking withdrawal after the claimed rejection of the claim by Zilla Parishad, the court granted permission for withdrawal and disposed of the writ petition while keeping the points open.
Permission to withdraw the writ petition granted; Writ petition disposed of as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1/1
wp483.1 3
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR.
WRIT PETITION NO. 483 OF 2013
Prakash Suklal Rahangdale
-vs-
The State of Maharashtra and others
Office notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders.
Court's or Judge's Orders.
Ms Jog, counsel h/f Mr.A.C.Dharmadhikari, counsel for the petitioner. Ms Tajwar Khan AGP for the respondent Nos.1 and 5. Mr.A.Y.Kapgate, counsel for the respondent Nos.2 and 3.
CORAM : SMT. VASANTI A. NAIK & V. K. JADHAV, JJ.
DATE : 02.07.2014.
Shri Kapgate, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondent Nos. 2 and 3, states that the claim of the petitioner is already decided by the Zilla Parishad and the same is rejected.
Ms Jog, the learned counsel holding for Shri A.C. Dharmadhikari, the learned counsel for the petitioner, states that the petitioner would take steps to file appropriate proceedings against the order rejecting the claim of the petitioner. The learned counsel seeks permission to withdraw the writ petition in view of the aforesaid background.
Permission is granted. Writ petition is disposed of as withdrawn. The points raised in the petition are, however, kept open.
JUDGE JUDGE
KHUNTE
Prakash Suklal Rahangdale
The State of Maharashtra
Vasanti A. Naik
V. K. Jadhav
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
