Mrs. Pushpa S. Khater v. the State of Maharashtra and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY…
What did the court decide?
Directed the petitioner to serve an updated petition copy on the sixth respondent’s advocate within one week and file an affidavit within two weeks; warned of dismissal for non-pros; listed on 24.09.2
What the court decided
pvr 1/2 7wp2112-14
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CR. WRIT PETITION NO.2112 OF 2014
Mrs.Pushpa S.Khater. .. Petitioner. Vs. 1.The State of Maharashtra & Ors. .. Respondents.
Mr.Nishant Sangle i/b. Mr.Mathews V.Nedumpara, for the Petitioner. Mr.M.V.Chaurasia i/b. Mr.M.K.Ambalal & Co., for Respondent no.6.
CORAM : A.S.OKA & G.S.KULKARNI, JJ.
DATED : 2nd SEPTEMBER, 2014.
P.C. :
- Notwithstanding the order dated 12.8.2014, the learned
Advocate for the petitioner has not served a copy of the petition to the Advocate for sixth respondent.
- We direct the learned Advocate for the petitioner to serve an up to date copy of the petition on the learned Advocate for sixth respondent within a period of one week. An affidavit to that effect shall be filed within a period of two weeks from today. If such an affidavit enclosing acknowledgement of the advocate of sixth respondent is not
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Mrs. Pushpa S. Khater
- respondent
The State of Maharashtra & Ors.
Coram
A.S. Oka
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
Anil Janardhan Kabadi, through P.A.O. Shri. Rajendra Shankar Bakale Vs Powar Grid Corporation of India Ltd. and Ors.
Anil Janardhan Kabadi, through P.A.O. Shri. Rajendra Shankar Bakale Vs Powar Grid Corporation of India Ltd. and Ors.
Shri. Gangadhar Sadashiv Jagtap and Ors. Vs Nashik Municipal Corporation and Ors.
Ranjit Gorakh Chavan Vs the Divisional Caste Scrutiny Committee, Pune Division, Pune and Ors.