The court disposed of the writ petition relying on statements made by the responding authority promising to apply its mind to the matter and serve notice before commencement of work.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
wp405
1
ssp
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.405 OF 2014
Anil Janardhan Kabadi ...Petitioner
vs.
Power Grid Corporation of
India Ltd. & Ors. ...Respondents
Mr.Surel Shah for the Petitioner
Mr.V.R.Dhond, Senior Advocate i/b Mr.Aniket Ranade for
the Respondent Nos.1 and 2
Mr.Avinash D. Kango a/w Ms Rutuja Ambekar for
respondent No.3
CORAM : A.S.OKA, &
G.S.KULKARNI,JJ.
DATE : SEPTEMBR 1,2014.
P.C.
1The learned senior counsel representing the first
and second respondents on instructions of the said
respondents states that the Competent Authority of the
first respondent will apply its mind to the
modification suggested by M/s.Isolux Corsan in the
Check Survey Approval between the AP No.7/0 to 7A/0
and will take a fresh decision in accordance with law.
He states that before commencing the work on the basis
of the approval which will be granted by the Competent
Authority, advance notice of atleast one week will be
served to the petitioner. We accept the statements.
2In view of the said statements, nothing survives
in this petition and the same is disposed of.
Anil Janardhan Kabadi
Power Grid Corporation of India Ltd.
A.S.Oka
G.S.Kulkarni
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court