Petitioner's furlough rejected due to unwilling surety. Disposed with liberty to reapply if competent surety provided.
Liberty to apply for grant of furlough afresh if petitioner is in a position to provide some other competent surety.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1303wp6.14
1/2
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.6 OF 2014
(Deepak Kundlik Kamble vs. The D.I.G. Prisons (E)(R) and another) __________________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders.
Ms. P.P. Choube, Advocate (appointed) for petitioner.
Mrs. N.R. Tripathi, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondents.
CORAM : B.R. GAVAI AND C.V. BHADANG, JJ.
DATED : MARCH 13, 2014
The application of the petitioner for furlough was rejected on the ground that petitioner's father is not willing to stand as surety.
In that view of the matter, the criminal writ petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to apply for grant of furlough afresh, if he is in a position to provide some other competent surety.
The fee payable to the learned Counsel
1303wp6.14
2/2
appointed for the petitioner is quantified as rupees one thousand five hundred.
JUDGE JUDGE
khj
Deepak Kundlik Kamble
The D.I.G. Prisons (E)(R)
another
B.R. Gavai
C.V. Bhadang
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
