In a writ petition filed for appellate side jurisdiction, the respondents stated the stayed application would be decided within two months, leading to the disposal of the petition without any substantive adjudication.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
36 wp.1989.14
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGABAD. APPELLATE SIDE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 1989 OF 2014
JANARDHAN GOVARDHAN JADHAV
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER
Advocate for Petitioner : Mr. Ajay Pawar, Advocate h/f Mr. Prashant R. Nangare. AGP for Respondents: Mr.K.G.Patil.
CORAM : R. M. BORDE and A. M. BADAR, JJ. DATE : 17th April, 2014.
P.C.:
. The learned AGP appearing on behalf of Respondent Nos.1 and 2, on instructions, made a statement that the application tendered by the Petitioner dated 3rd September, 2013 will be decided as far as possible within a period of two months from today. In view of the statement made by the learned AGP appearing on behalf of Respondent Nos.1 and 2, nothing survives for consideration in the writ petition.
[ A. M. BADAR, J. ] [ R. M. BORDE, J. ]
ndm
Janardhan Govardhan Jadhav
The State of Maharashtra
Another
R. M. Borde
A. M. Badar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
