Respondents directed to pass a speaking order on the petitioner's representation regarding revenue record entry within four months. The writ petition and pending civil application disposed of.
Direction to respondents to pass a speaking order on petitioner's representation within four months.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
wp3150.13
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO. 3150 OF 2013
Chhabai w/o Govindrao Katkar .. PETITIONER
VERSUS
The Collector, Osmanabad
& others .. RESPONDENTS
Mr. G. R. Syed, advocate holding for Mr. P. P. Kulkarni, advocate for petitioner.
Mr. S. G. Karlekar, AGP for the State.
=====
CORAM : R.M. BORDE &
A. M. BADAR, JJ. DATE : 16th APRIL, 2014.
PER COURT :
action of revenue authorities in not recording the name of petitioner in the
revenue record in pursuance to representation tendered by him. It was
open for the revenue authority to pass appropriate order on the representation tendered by petitioner and dispose of the same for the reasons recorded in affidavit-in-reply. It is expected of the authorities to
pass speaking order while deciding the representation / application tendered by petitioner.
wp3150.13
2
disposed of.
( A. M. BADAR ) ( R. M. BORDE ) JUDGE JUDGE dyb
Chhabai w/o Govindrao Katkar
The Collector, Osmanabad
R.M. Borde
A. M. Badar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
