The high court held that the cause for filing the writ petition did not survive due to an earlier order dated 7.7.2014 in Writ Petition No. 6068 of 2013.
The writ petition is disposed of with no order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
wp1936-13
1
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No . IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR
WRIT PETITION No. 1936 OF 2013 Bhaskar s/o Mayaram Barayya
Vrs.
State of Mah. Through its Secretary and others.
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders
Court's or Judge's orders
Shri A. Parchure, counsel for the petitioner. Shri N.R. Patil, AGP for respondent no.1. Ms. Khan, counsel for respondent no. 2. Shri Kalwaghe, counsel for respondent no.3.
CORAM : SMT. VASANTI A. NAIK AND V.K. JADHAV, JJ.
DATE : 7 TH JULY , 2014 .
In view of the order dated 7.7.2014 in Writ Petition No.6068 of 2013, the cause for filing this writ petition does not survive.
The writ petition is, therefore, disposed of with no order as to costs.
JUDGE
JUDGE
Hirekhan
Bhaskar s/o Mayaram Barayya
State of Mah.
Vasanti A. Naik
V.K. Jadhav
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
