This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
WP2113-13
1
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No . IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR
WRIT PETITION NO. 2113/2013
(ARCHANA SANJAY BHELKAR VERSUS STATE OF MAH. & OTHERS)
CORAM : SMT. VASANTI A. NAIK AND
V.K. JADHAV, JJ.
DATE : JULY 4, 2014.
Shri Mohagaonkar, the learned counsel for the petitioner, states that the petitioner is already absorbed by the Deputy Director by an order dated 23.04.2014 and, hence, the writ petition may be disposed of.
Since the grievance of the petitioner stands redressed, the writ petition is disposed of with no order as to costs.
JUDGE JUDGE
APTE
Archana Sanjay Bhelkar
State of Maharashtra
Vasanti A. Naik
V.K. Jadhav
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
