The High Court at Nagpur disposed of a contempt petition filed under Writ Petition No. 3693/2013. Upon the petitioner's counsel stating that the caste claim was verified, the court discharged the notice with no order as to costs.
Notice discharged; no order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CP61-14
1
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No . IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR
CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 61/2014 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 3693/2013 (D)
(SEEMA MUKUNDA NANNAWARE VERSUS SHRI R.S. WADWI)
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders
Court's or Judge's orders
Shri S.D. Malke, counsel for the petitioners.
CORAM : SMT. VASANTI A. NAIK AND V.K. JADHAV, JJ.
DATE : JULY 4, 2014.
Shri Malke, the learned counsel for the petitioners, states that the caste claim of the petitioner is verified.
In view of the aforesaid statement, the contempt petition is disposed of with no order as to costs. The notice stands discharged.
JUDGE JUDGE
APTE
Seema Mukunda Nannaware
Shri R.S. Wadwi
Vasanti A. Naik
V.K. Jadhav
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
